Alex Jones @ INFOWARS.COM reports that Google plans to shut down the YouTube channel

He reports that Google and YouTube were set up by CIA and NQTel to spy on users, and manipulate the news people receive via these channels:

OccupyWebsite News Post Forum
Posted in occupywebsite.org | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Does the Energy Sector want to do to the Environment as the Banking Industry did to the Economy?

Why, then, are Republicans pretending otherwise? Part of the answer is that the party is rewarding its benefactors: the oil and gas industry doesn’t create many jobs, but it does spend a lot of money on lobbying and campaign contributions. The rest of the answer is simply the fact that conservatives have no other job-creation ideas to offer.

And intellectual bankruptcy, I’m sorry to say, is a problem that no amount of drilling and fracking can solve.

Posted in news.linked.in | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Leipzig Book Fair

There’s a lot of ACTA talk at the Leipzig Book Fair — if you have some answers to my questions, then please let me know! ;)

Posted in news.linked.in | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

It’s about time!

A manifesto for being male, being a man, and nonetheless living the life of a mensch.

Posted in news.linked.in | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

I think I made a “thinking outside of the box” mistake

Of course I’m not 100% certain, but I think that years ago I made a mistake — one that has only really hit me with full force in the past couple weeks.

It’s actually a very simple matter: What I once considered to be a dichotomy is probably more of a trichotomy… and this three-state approach used in information retrieval logic is of immense importance (I may be overusing the three-state logic metaphor somewhat, but I am confident enough that it is valid to say “I don’t think so”).

This new and more nuanced approach helps to explain why the web is perhaps not as “scientific” as traditional professional, research and science publishing media are. In particular: the repercussions of the failure to distinguish all three aspects of the trichotomy may lead to grave errors that affect the measurement of data, and the assessment of reliability and validity of the shared data.

:|

Posted in news.linked.in | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Inside Baseball

There is a very interesting discussion that my friend Anil Dash linked to — here’s the starting point: How do blogs need to evolve? I find it particularly fascinating because this discussion reflects many of the topics I have been addressing over the past several weeks (if you haven’t been following them — well, then that’s your problem, not mine! ;) )

I will mosey on over and suggest to Anil that he invite Matt Mullenweg and/or John Battelle to this discussion — those are two additional perspectives I would really appreciate having in the Mix. Oh, and also Dave Winer, of course (who wrote a very nice introductory piece that is also linked to in the above discussion: “What is Relative Writing?”). In my opinion, these voices (and probably some others, too — maybe Pierre Omidyar?) would add even more perspectives to an already fascinating discussion.

Note that (with respect to the “ownership” topic) I have always maintained that language cannot be owned — see also a recent example of my writing regarding this: “Barry Diller (and some others) get how brands, brand names and the Wisdom of the Language work better than Mark Zuckerberg and most social media wonks do“.

Look forward to following this discussion some more — and I also do wonder why the discussion participants are having this discussion on one domain… — couldn’t the central location simply list the RSS feeds that are dedicated to this particular discussion? ;)

Posted in news.linked.in | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

This is RIDICULOUS

Facebook is ridiculous… — there — I said it!

Last night I was chatting with a facebook friend — who is very knowledgeable in her field and by no means a dummy in any regard — about an update she made regarding her “hometown” (the German city named “Essen”). I joked that the city has a domain name that could easily be worth a billion dollars. My friend had found it odd that it showed that she was “at” Essen rather than “from” Essen. I followed the link and found out that she had actually listed a company called “Essen” rather than the city named “Essen” as her hometown. This is, however, not user error — the facebook interface is extremely limited and not user-friendly. I have at times found it impossible to link to the information I intended to link to.

In my opinion, the writing is on the wall for facebook.com. This is no longer a viable platform for users to use in a utilitarian way. It has now become a utility that enables companies to use users. Anyone who thinks this website is worth US$ 100 billion is a moron.

I have heard that the going rate to get an Indian child to click “Like” is about 5 cents — so 10,000 “Likes” cost about $500. What is odd is that this (reliable, but perhaps somewhat confused) informant also was “amazed” at how good facebook was at preventing spam. This is the sort of disconnect that has a lot of people not questioning the facebook valuation.

Google, Twitter, Facebook,… — these are all gigantic melting pots in which morsels of information get flooded in a deluge of misinformation. That is the business model: To drown out any meaningful information, such that companies must pay money in the hope of maybe getting some kind of message across.

I no longer see any value in this, and I honestly cannot fathom why any company would have an interest in being associated with such ridiculous nonsense. In my opinion this is the online equivalent of a tabloid newspaper — only worse, because tabloid newspapers at least have enough sense to actually pay for the kind sensationalism that will attract gawkers consistently.

I am not going to close my facebook account yet (though I wonder if perhaps the facebook management team might?)… but I am now officially looking for a comparable platform that is not run by people who are cutesy clowns, but rather by people who are actually reasonable — and who also expect their users to have brains rather just eyeballs. Oh, how I miss omidyar.net! :|

Posted in news.linked.in | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Word!

Mark Zuckerberg (and the facebook.com executive team) need/s to pay attention to this.

Posted in news.linked.in | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

There is a reality that haunts the United States of America today — the reality of economic planning

If you’re not too big to fail, then you’re probably too small to matter:

the existence of important agglomeration economies immediately implies that there are social consequences to the success or failure of an individual firm that aren’t captured by the profit and loss statement of that firm alone. Let General Motors fail, and the resulting collapse of its suppliers will hurt other firms too, possibly driving them out of business too.

Posted in news.linked.in | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Why do some dogs have short tails and other dogs have long tails?

According to Mark Pagel, the answer must be that the length of one dog’s tail versus the length another dog’s tail is not a “functionally equivalent trait”.

But the much more important question I have for Mark Pagel is: How did the Papuan man he speaks of both understand his question and also know the answer he gave? ;)

Posted in news.linked.in | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment